Judge: Druggists may withhold “morning-after” pill
Filed Under (Bad News, News) by Ian on 09-11-2007
Tagged Under : drugs, judge, morning-after, pharmacies, pills, religion, ruling
Great news! Pharmacies can now cite religious reasons for not making the ‘morning-after’ pill available to those who request it! What’s that you say? Your health/life might be in danger? Too bad! It’s the pharmacist that really matters here, not you. Just think about how the pharmacists must feel, I mean, Jesus very specifically said “Thou shalt not dispense morning-after pills to potentially pregnant women who requesteth”. Would you want to burn in hell for eternity (give or take a few days) because you gave a 14 year old girl morning-after pills? Not me, that’s for sure.
Judge: Druggists may withhold “morning-after” pill
A federal judge has suspended controversial state rules requiring pharmacies to dispense so-called “Plan B” emergency contraceptives, saying the rules appear to unconstitutionally violate pharmacists’ freedom of religion.
The rules appear to force pharmacists to choose between their own religious beliefs and their livelihood, Judge Ronald B. Leighton of the U.S. District Court in Tacoma wrote Thursday.
Some pharmacists believe the emergency contraceptive pills, also called “morning-after pills,” are tantamount to abortion because they can in some cases prevent implantation of a fertilized egg.
“Whether or not Plan B … terminates a pregnancy, to those who believe that life begins at conception, the drug is designed to terminate a life,” the judge wrote in a 27-page order granting a preliminary injunction.
Thus, Leighton said, the current rules “appear designed to impose a Hobson’s choice for the majority of pharmacists who object to Plan B: dispense a drug that ends a life as defined by their religious teachings, or leave their present positions in the state of Washington.”
Under Leighton’s order, pharmacists may now refuse to dispense the medication but must refer a patient to “the nearest” or “a nearby” source for the drug.
State officials said it was too early to say whether they would appeal.
“This is a complex issue with a complex ruling,” said Donn Moyer, a state Department of Health spokesman. “We’re certainly going to talk to our lawyers.”
Anyone who has religious deficiencies and works as a doctor or pharmacist should really either give up the deficiency or change the career. They having their view makes that other people’s rights are violated.
i’m going to have to make a point of asking at Target if they allow their druggists to do this and if so, never filling my prescriptions there
or just beating the druggist repeatedly with a brick of logic
To some of us who actually reside in Washington, this seemed counter-productive to the realities of a pharmacist’s profession.