Atheism: The Non-Prophet Way Of Life

Here we expose the religions of the world for the frauds they really are. Preying on the gullible and lost, giving them all the answers they want to hear, and in turn leading them into a world of ignorance and disinformation; religion has got to go.

Romney Spokesman Won’t Say If Atheists Have Place In America

Filed Under (Bad News, News) by Ian on 08-12-2007

Tagged Under : , , , , ,

 As much as I dislike Giuliani, Romney has now taken top place for candidates I dislike. He wants tolerance for his religion, but wants none for non-believers. Fuck Romney.

Romney Spokesman Won’t Say If Atheists Have Place In America

A spokesman for the Mitt Romney campaign is thus far refusing to say whether Romney sees any positive role in America for atheists and other non-believers, after Election Central inquired about the topic yesterday

It’s a sign that Romney may be seeking to submerge evangelical distaste for Mormonism by uniting the two groups together in a wider culture war. Romney’s speech has come under some criticism, even from conservatives like David Brooks and Ramesh Ponnuru, for positively mentioning many prominent religions but failing to include anything positive about atheists and agnostics.

Indeed, the only mentions of non-believers were very much negative. “It is as if they’re intent on establishing a new religion in America – the religion of secularism. They’re wrong,” Romney said, being met by applause from the audience.

Read More

Comments:

8 Responses to “Romney Spokesman Won’t Say If Atheists Have Place In America”

  1. The Shane on 8 Dec 2007 at 3:09pm #

    I hate this fucker.

  2. BlackSun on 8 Dec 2007 at 5:16pm #

    Choose your poison:

    Romney: Mormon once-liberal now pandering to Evangelicals and bashing atheists.
    Huckabee: Evolution denier who once advocated separating HIV patients from the population.
    Giuliani: Centrist with personal problems who can’t win the nomination.

  3. Ian on 8 Dec 2007 at 6:42pm #

    I’d rather Kucinich.

  4. Miykael Poly on 9 Dec 2007 at 4:06am #

    As far as I have seen, Ron Paul is the only smart one…

  5. Spoonman on 10 Dec 2007 at 7:01am #

    Then you haven’t been paying enough attention to this site:

    http://www.irreligion.org/2007/08/17/to-arms-its-a-war-against-religion/

    Ron Paul believes the Constitution is “replete” with religious references establishing the US as a christian nation. Considering the first sentence he’s supposed to speak as President includes his defending the Constitution, I can’t vote for an idiot who hasn’t even bothered to read the damn thing!

  6. Miykael Poly on 10 Dec 2007 at 3:22pm #

    I am not american, never going to be one… As long as USA leaves the rest of the world alone, I dont really care if USA is a christian nation or not.

    The thing I have noticed, is that people go nuts over a single issue, like religion, abortion, and etc. and fail to see the big picture. No one is perfect, but when it comes to a bigger picture, I have noticed that Ron Paul has more workable solutions than others.

    And before you ask, the reason I follow the presidental races in USA, is that I like to know what kind of morons are running for the job. And the situation in USA does effect the rest of the world.

  7. mikael on 21 Dec 2007 at 1:05am #

    Although Ron Paul isn’t perfect, I think he is our best choice. The man might look a little goofy, but his record speaks of honor, intelligence, and a real dedication to individual freedom.

  8. Ian on 21 Dec 2007 at 8:29am #

    I’d say Ron Paul definitely has his shortcomings. e.g. he doesn’t believe in evolution.

    Thhhaaaaat said, he believes in the US Constitution, meaning he (probably) wont stomp all over my rights the way King George has.

Leave a Reply