<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adam Carolla on Religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irreligion.org/2009/02/20/adam-carolla-on-religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.irreligion.org/2009/02/20/adam-carolla-on-religion/</link>
	<description>Your last stop before eternal enlightenment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 04:50:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nekouken</title>
		<link>http://www.irreligion.org/2009/02/20/adam-carolla-on-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-23847</link>
		<dc:creator>nekouken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irreligion.org/?p=546#comment-23847</guid>
		<description>I got one minute in and couldn&#039;t listen anymore.  Mega Comrade&#039;s criticism was exactly the first thing to pop into my mind as well -- with the addendum that the laws of the universe are not 100% certain even in the minds of those scientists who study and apply them routinely; there is always some margin for error -- if for no other reason that saying you know there&#039;s no god means that you&#039;ll deny it even if you&#039;re faced with falsifiable evidence of one&#039;s existence.

The next thing he goes to pisses me off, too; the implication that everybody knows there&#039;s no god and insist there is only out of fear of death.  I&#039;m an atheist, but I&#039;ve encountered hundreds of valid reasons for any one person to believe in a god of some sort beyond the fear of death.  That insistence that everybody knows something you &lt;i&gt;think&lt;/i&gt; is true is just as bad as the theists one encounters who insist that atheists know there &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; a god, and reject this knowledge because we want license to be immoral or something equally stupid.

Then again, I&#039;ve never really been all that impressed with Adam Corolla, so I suppose I didn&#039;t expect much when I hit &quot;play.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got one minute in and couldn&#8217;t listen anymore.  Mega Comrade&#8217;s criticism was exactly the first thing to pop into my mind as well &#8212; with the addendum that the laws of the universe are not 100% certain even in the minds of those scientists who study and apply them routinely; there is always some margin for error &#8212; if for no other reason that saying you know there&#8217;s no god means that you&#8217;ll deny it even if you&#8217;re faced with falsifiable evidence of one&#8217;s existence.</p>
<p>The next thing he goes to pisses me off, too; the implication that everybody knows there&#8217;s no god and insist there is only out of fear of death.  I&#8217;m an atheist, but I&#8217;ve encountered hundreds of valid reasons for any one person to believe in a god of some sort beyond the fear of death.  That insistence that everybody knows something you <i>think</i> is true is just as bad as the theists one encounters who insist that atheists know there <i>is</i> a god, and reject this knowledge because we want license to be immoral or something equally stupid.</p>
<p>Then again, I&#8217;ve never really been all that impressed with Adam Corolla, so I suppose I didn&#8217;t expect much when I hit &#8220;play.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mega Comrade</title>
		<link>http://www.irreligion.org/2009/02/20/adam-carolla-on-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-23818</link>
		<dc:creator>Mega Comrade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irreligion.org/?p=546#comment-23818</guid>
		<description>I find it annoying that he implies you have to &#039;know&#039; god doesn&#039;t exist to be an atheist. Agnotic is NOT a the middle ground, it is a statement on knowledge. Most people are Agnostic Atheist rather than simply Atheist.

This misconception really annoys me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it annoying that he implies you have to &#8216;know&#8217; god doesn&#8217;t exist to be an atheist. Agnotic is NOT a the middle ground, it is a statement on knowledge. Most people are Agnostic Atheist rather than simply Atheist.</p>
<p>This misconception really annoys me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
