Sharia Law

June 3rd, 2010 | Tags: , , , , ,

  1. Neutral Views
    June 6th, 2010 at 07:39
    Reply | Quote | #1

    stoning look bad?

    in islam

    stone = commit adultery and get caught by FOUR people all at once….

    • Ian
      June 6th, 2010 at 09:58
      Reply | Quote | #2

      Right, that makes it ok… fuckin psycho.

      • Neutral Views
        June 6th, 2010 at 10:29
        Reply | Quote | #3

        Yes, it does

        • Ian
          June 6th, 2010 at 10:30
          Reply | Quote | #4

          Allow me to restate: You’re a fucking psychopath.

          • Hal
            June 7th, 2010 at 08:57
            Quote | #5

            Neutral Views, you’ve been exposed as full of shit numerous times now.
            Go read your Qur’an again.

  2. Hal
    June 6th, 2010 at 08:45
    Reply | Quote | #6

    Why do you keep stressing this ridiculous rule of 4 passers-by?
    Are you saying if 2 horny infidels gets caught fucking in an olive tree by, shall we say, 3 police officers then they would get a slap on the wrist but with 4 then it’s a stoning?
    You detract from the main point which is the suffering many have been put through because of this barbaric and uncivilised law.
    The cunts that take part in the stonings are just an angry lynch mob who don’t really need an excuse (or 4 witnesses) to draw blood from another.

    • Neutral Views
      June 6th, 2010 at 10:30
      Reply | Quote | #7

      sharia laws like those only apply to muslims retard.

      if 2 “infidels” were caught, they’d get put in jail for fucking in public

      • Ian
        June 6th, 2010 at 10:31
        Reply | Quote | #8

        Bullshit, they would kill them the same. Also, why the hell should it be considered acceptable just because their Muslims. It’s fucking barbaric.

        Neutral Views my ass. You might as well be an Islamic Terrorist.

        • Greenworld
          June 6th, 2010 at 21:16
          Reply | Quote | #9

          Ian :Neutral Views my ass. You might as well be an Islamic Terrorist.

          An Islamic terrorist with “neutral views.”
          Now, allow me 5 minutes to calm down from all this laughter.

      • Andre
        June 6th, 2010 at 13:33

        There was a case quite recently, I think it was 2 years ago, of a reporter from a European country who was stoned to death. This man was NOT a muslim. This man was an infidel. (I’ve searched and searched for this example, and can’t find it. It’s possible that I am mistaken on the specifics.)
        Neutral Views, your bullshit has been exposed.
        Perhaps the majority are muslims, I won’t deny this. This doesn’t make it in any way justifiable.
        The beheading of “criminals” as well is a punishment dealt to both muslims and non-muslims alike when the “criminal” breaks an islamic law. Yet again, a reporter, from Europe, was beheaded for allegedly breaking one of their laws.
        They have stoned people for less than adultery.

  3. Scott
    June 7th, 2010 at 17:11

    No rational, humane individual can look at the punishments dealt out by Sharia law and not see it for the barbaric and vile construct that it is, practiced by cultural primitives who never mentally left the bronze age.